Get e-book The Portable Museum: An Electronic Collection of Literature in Translation

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online The Portable Museum: An Electronic Collection of Literature in Translation file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with The Portable Museum: An Electronic Collection of Literature in Translation book. Happy reading The Portable Museum: An Electronic Collection of Literature in Translation Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF The Portable Museum: An Electronic Collection of Literature in Translation at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF The Portable Museum: An Electronic Collection of Literature in Translation Pocket Guide.

New Haven Museum » Past Exhibitions

It provides harmonisation between museum and bibliographic information by capturing the underlying semantics of bibliographic data. The project represents a logical and practical expansion of the work currently being undertaken by the ResearchSpace project that itself creates rich semantic representations of cultural heritage data using the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model CRM for research and engagement purposes.

This work constructs versions of the spells according to different Ancient Egyptian traditions. It creates a hierarchy of knowledge representation that extends across the boundaries of a database an RDF triplestore and web pages that include URIs that are part of the overall URI schema.

Reading This Report

This represents a different approach and outcome to traditional methods of manuscript digital representation using XML tags often based on TEI. Instead of being concerned solely with representing text within a defined corpus of digitised manuscripts it aims to extend search results by making connections with other manuscripts and object types that might have a direct or indirect connection with the Book of the Dead spells. From the interchange applications predicted in the near-term, the identifiable types included character based alphanumeric text in free and fielded format and continuous tone, bi-level, and raster images.

The Committee concluded that in the midterm 5 years out museum applications will evolve and technology advance to require facilities for interchange of vector graphics for Computer-aided design, binary files including multimedia, and sampled analog data such as sound or waveform, and linked hypermedia and time synchronized data. In the longer term even this list will need extension as other types are identified.

  • British Romanticism and the Catholic Question: Religion, History and National Identity, 1778-1829?
  • Article Metrics?
  • Table of Contents.

Standards above the data representation level must be insulated from the nature of the data. Multiple data representation methods must be accommodated. Images, graphics, and sound may be represented in different manners, each appropriate to differing degrees of fidelity, compression schemes, or simply representing a lack of a dominant standard. Any or all may be encountered in a single functional interchange. As the Committee learned more about OSI however, it became clear that the requirement to carry different kinds of data within a single session was satisfied by lower level OSI standards.

Especially given the potential need to interchange multimedia data objects which are often very large digitally encoded files, there must be no limiting restrictions on the size of records and the amount of data capable of being interchanged. The Committee was happy to discover that the seventh through tenthrequirements on its initial list were satisfied by adopting the open systems model and its associated standards. Thus museums didn't need to construct standards specifically to support a range of media transmission options, accommodate multiple transmission protocols in a single interchange session, carry information for one or more museum applications in a single interchange session or support batch, and realtime interactive modes of operation as applications require.

Works Cited

In addition, the requirements numbered were found to be either unnecessary to state or conceptually impossible to satisfy. For example, while all the protocols enabled interchange of transactions not fully specified in advance, the meaning of data received in this way would by definition be unknown to the receiving system, so the value of the interchange would be minimal.

It was thought desirable to have a declarative capability within an interchange session allowing transactions to carry sufficient information about them to allow intelligent reception by receiving systems without complete prior agreements, but no actual need for this, not to mention the feasibility, has been demonstrated. As more was learned about the role of standard formats as a neutral vehicle between two internal schemas we realized the requirement to carry content independent of sending or receiving system, application, or implementation data model was partly inherent in our definition of interchange and partly the responsibility of the Task Groups specifying data content requirements for services.

The same conclusion was reached about the requirement to support migration of data between systems and be compatible with existing network held data with limited loss. Finally, the requirement that the standards be both possible and practical to implement on a wide variety of systems was deemed important by all. The best way to assure this was to build the CIMI Standards Framework around existing frameworks such as OSI and OSE which were already impacting on the availability of standard methods on a wide variety of platforms and in many software environments.

While exploring museum functional requirements, the CIMI Committee developed a list of museum applications that could involve interchange. This is shown in Figure Because CIMI had decided in principle to adopt interchange protocols, methods and standards that were already in service, it made sense to cluster the museum applications involving interchange in such a way that they corresponded with services in existing standards frameworks. Those frameworks suggested that interchange applications would employ the discrete suites of standards in building databases, exchanging messages, consulting databases, transmitting files, and conducting business transactions.

Museums document their collections and build reference databases on people, organizations, places and events which played a role in the creation, trade and use of objects within the scope of their collections.

Typically when museum professionals think of information interchange they think first about inter-institutional exchange of data about collections at the object level, however, our research suggests that there is less demand for interchange of this information than is initially envisioned. When museums do exchange this data to construct shared databases or union catalogues they obtain none of the economic advantages which libraries realize from being able to use such databases for copy cataloguing because museum objects are typically unique. Collection related information exchange seems to be more valuable for museums when the object of description is the collection or even the repository.

Distributed reading: Literary reading in diverse environments

Museums do have a great interest in the exchange and copying of data about individuals, organizations, places and events associated with collection objects. These files of authoritative information which relate to entities other than the objects in collections are essential to research and to make links between objects for interpretation. Information about people in many roles makers, donors, lenders, vendors , manufacturers, geographical locations, and events are commonly mentioned as being shareable, cooperatively developed or maintained, or consulted in reference fashion.

Museums also need to share vocabularies, thesauri, name lists, and classification systems which are used to index objects in collections. Research use of database information does not usually require the exchange of complete databases or of records being contributed to a central database, but depends rather on information retrieval. Standards for information retrieval should permit a user of one museum system to make inquiries into the public information on another museum system from a different vendor and receive a response through the familiar interface of his or her own system.

With the growing use of the Internet by museums and scholarly organizations, information retrieval standards would result in the creation of large "virtual databases" comprised of many different systems, distributed in location but accessible through a single protocol.

Nabokov Journals

There seems to be general agreement about the utility of a broad range of general reference bases used primarily in a consultative manner. This interest is substantiated both by the experience of information service providers such as CHIN and RLG who receive constant requests for such services, in the articulated needs of potential users, and in actual usage demonstrated by the Conservation Information Network. The library community has recently led the way in this area by developing and promoting a protocol for information retrieval which many vendors and networks are now implementing.

All organizations engage in transactions involving outside firms. Over the past decade, methods have been developed for many such transactions to be conducted electronically. We are all acquainted with the effect of this change as we use Automatic Teller Machines and enjoy the benefits of automatic reordering of inventory at the grocery.

The Portable Museum: An Electronic Collection of Literature in Translation (Issue #2)

Museums conduct many of the same activities as any other business or organization; they manage facilities, operate retail and mail order operations, order supplies, manage staff. These activities involve a variety of forms-based transaction-oriented information interchange applications that are increasingly conducted in the commercial sector by EDI. When cost-effective, museums might move towards electronic transactions in these areas as well. In addition, museums and other cultural repositories such as libraries and archives, engage in collections management activities which involve transactions specific to themselves, including acquisitions, loans, and numerous aspects of exhibition management.

Specific obligatory relations are created in the course of these transactions which are now conducted on paper using the mail and fax. For example, deeds of gift must be executed, insurance and customs arrangements made, shippers arranged, loans requested and recalled.

Libraries have again pioneered here in developing electronic ordering of books and electronic interlibrary loan requests, and museums have much to gain if they could electronically interchange the complex transactions surrounding exhibitions which otherwise must be rekeyed in numerous systems many times. In an era of interconnected computers, the most widely used application service is message handling.

The increased availability of electronic mail has stimulated interest in messaging and communications services for museums. A variety of list servers, bulletin boards, conferencing services, and interpersonal and inter-institutional communications in museums use electronic mail because the foundation standards for these services have been put in place by others.

The interchange of documents which look and act the way their authors wanted them to regardless of the receiving system has long been a goal of interchange. Museums would like to control the way their catalogues or even their correspondence looked to the recipients for the same reasons other institutions do. Museums also have the same need to be able to communicate documents to printers complete with appropriate mark up and to reformat documents created for one purpose without rekeying them.

Document handling standards have been defined to support all these kinds of requirements, but as yet they have not been broadly implemented in commercial software because of their complexity and because many users do not have a strong enough requirement for final form document interchange to make it commercially necessary to provide such functions. It is anticipated that document handling functionality will be an increasingly important requirement in many business sectors in the next decade and standards for document handling will be more widely implemented. Meanwhile, in museums, the emphasis will be on interchange of the logical components of documents and the retention of whatever structure authors have created when the document is transferred to another system.

Sometimes institutions want to move entire data sets from one system to another. The purpose may be to replace the existing system data migration , or to have a copy in a different location or integrated into another application. Examples of useful file transfer include publishing catalogues, printing gallery labels incorporating collections data, downloading specimen records to a customs broker or sending a research database to a colleague.

These applications in museums are sufficiently generic that there are well established protocols for them in business computing. Interactive exhibits and training, environmental and security monitoring, and programming often require one computer, with or without a human operator, to work directly on a remote system.

Each of these categories employs a variety of standards which together establish semantic, data representation, and communication protocol agreement. Within these there are several dominant standards that could provide the technical methods for museum interchange functions. This chapter examines the representative international standards that relate to the museum interchange applications introduced in Chapter III. It examines how specific standards differ in capabilities or approaches but is intended to be as simple and nontechnical as possible without being misleading; readings listed in the bibliography provide more technical detail.

The CIMI Committee recognized that standards for interchange of museum information should result from adoption of existing standards whenever possible since museums had neither the technical expertise nor marketplace clout to develop de facto standards for any part of the interchange except data content. The museum community need not invent any ISO level or their equivalent standards to support interchange of its data.

NYU MA in Literary Translation: French to English

It recognizes, however, that while the framework can sound definitive on this issue, concrete recommendations are often difficult to formulate because standards, especially in the area of video compression, are undergoing rapid development and implementations are lagging behind the adoption of new standards. Figure 14 shows the standards that support each of the functional areas. Each of these standards supports one or more of the museum applications in the areas of business and curatorial information interchange involving textual and multimedia information, scientific measurements, citations and business obligations.